Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study.
Identifieur interne : 000F52 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000F51; suivant : 000F53Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study.
Auteurs : Sema Murat [Turquie] ; Kivanç Kamburo Lu ; Tuncer ÖzenSource :
- The Journal of oral implantology [ 0160-6972 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- Cadaver, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Photography, Dental, Software Validation, Surgery, Computer-Assisted.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to measure the accuracy of the cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT)- aided StentCad Beyond surgical guidance system and to compare bone-supported and tooth/bone-supported guidance by using this system in dental implant placement ex vivo. Five cadaver mandibles were scanned using an Iluma CBCT scanner. After scanning, DICOM slices were transferred to the StentCad Beyond implant simulation software, which was used for preoperative implant planning. Using the StentCad Beyond guidance system, 9 implant drills were inserted using a bone-supported guidance system and 11 using a tooth/bone-supported guidance system. Mandibles were scanned again and these data were transferred to the StentCad Beyond software. Pre- and postoperative information was superimposed using the Rhinoceros version 4 software program, and deviations between planned and actual drill positions were calculated for each implant. In addition, differences between bone-supported and tooth/bone-supported guidance systems were analyzed by t-test, with a significance level of P < .05. Data analysis found a mean coronal deviation of 1.2 ± 0.3 mm and 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, mean apical deviation of 1.3 ± 0.6 mm and 0.7 ± 0.6 mm, mean apical and coronal depth deviation of 1.4 ± 0.3 mm and 1.3 ± 0.3 mm, and mean angular deviation of 4.2° ± 2.0° and 3.0° ± 1.5° for tooth/bone supported and bone-supported guides, respectively. No statistical differences were found in depth or angular deviations between groups (P > .05); however, statistically significant differences between groups were found in mean horizontal coronal deviation (P = .016) and mean horizontal apical deviation (P = .047). The StentCad Beyond system was found to be a reliable guide for placing implants ex vivo.
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00062
PubMed: 21767205
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21767205Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study.</title><author><name sortKey="Murat, Sema" sort="Murat, Sema" uniqKey="Murat S" first="Sema" last="Murat">Sema Murat</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. semamurat47@yahoo.com.tr</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kamburo Lu, Kivanc" sort="Kamburo Lu, Kivanc" uniqKey="Kamburo Lu K" first="Kivanç" last="Kamburo Lu">Kivanç Kamburo Lu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ozen, Tuncer" sort="Ozen, Tuncer" uniqKey="Ozen T" first="Tuncer" last="Özen">Tuncer Özen</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21767205</idno><idno type="pmid">21767205</idno><idno type="doi">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00062</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000E58</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000E58</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000E58</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000E58</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000E58</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000E58</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study.</title><author><name sortKey="Murat, Sema" sort="Murat, Sema" uniqKey="Murat S" first="Sema" last="Murat">Sema Murat</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. semamurat47@yahoo.com.tr</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kamburo Lu, Kivanc" sort="Kamburo Lu, Kivanc" uniqKey="Kamburo Lu K" first="Kivanç" last="Kamburo Lu">Kivanç Kamburo Lu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ozen, Tuncer" sort="Ozen, Tuncer" uniqKey="Ozen T" first="Tuncer" last="Özen">Tuncer Özen</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">0160-6972</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cadaver</term><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Photography, Dental</term><term>Software Validation</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Cadavre</term><term>Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Photographie dentaire</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique</term><term>Traitement d'image par ordinateur</term><term>Validation de logiciel</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Cadaver</term><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term><term>Humans</term><term>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Photography, Dental</term><term>Software Validation</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Cadavre</term><term>Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur</term><term>Humains</term><term>Photographie dentaire</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique</term><term>Traitement d'image par ordinateur</term><term>Validation de logiciel</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of the present study was to measure the accuracy of the cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT)- aided StentCad Beyond surgical guidance system and to compare bone-supported and tooth/bone-supported guidance by using this system in dental implant placement ex vivo. Five cadaver mandibles were scanned using an Iluma CBCT scanner. After scanning, DICOM slices were transferred to the StentCad Beyond implant simulation software, which was used for preoperative implant planning. Using the StentCad Beyond guidance system, 9 implant drills were inserted using a bone-supported guidance system and 11 using a tooth/bone-supported guidance system. Mandibles were scanned again and these data were transferred to the StentCad Beyond software. Pre- and postoperative information was superimposed using the Rhinoceros version 4 software program, and deviations between planned and actual drill positions were calculated for each implant. In addition, differences between bone-supported and tooth/bone-supported guidance systems were analyzed by t-test, with a significance level of P < .05. Data analysis found a mean coronal deviation of 1.2 ± 0.3 mm and 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, mean apical deviation of 1.3 ± 0.6 mm and 0.7 ± 0.6 mm, mean apical and coronal depth deviation of 1.4 ± 0.3 mm and 1.3 ± 0.3 mm, and mean angular deviation of 4.2° ± 2.0° and 3.0° ± 1.5° for tooth/bone supported and bone-supported guides, respectively. No statistical differences were found in depth or angular deviations between groups (P > .05); however, statistically significant differences between groups were found in mean horizontal coronal deviation (P = .016) and mean horizontal apical deviation (P = .047). The StentCad Beyond system was found to be a reliable guide for placing implants ex vivo.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21767205</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0160-6972</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>38</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>706-12</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00062</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The aim of the present study was to measure the accuracy of the cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT)- aided StentCad Beyond surgical guidance system and to compare bone-supported and tooth/bone-supported guidance by using this system in dental implant placement ex vivo. Five cadaver mandibles were scanned using an Iluma CBCT scanner. After scanning, DICOM slices were transferred to the StentCad Beyond implant simulation software, which was used for preoperative implant planning. Using the StentCad Beyond guidance system, 9 implant drills were inserted using a bone-supported guidance system and 11 using a tooth/bone-supported guidance system. Mandibles were scanned again and these data were transferred to the StentCad Beyond software. Pre- and postoperative information was superimposed using the Rhinoceros version 4 software program, and deviations between planned and actual drill positions were calculated for each implant. In addition, differences between bone-supported and tooth/bone-supported guidance systems were analyzed by t-test, with a significance level of P < .05. Data analysis found a mean coronal deviation of 1.2 ± 0.3 mm and 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, mean apical deviation of 1.3 ± 0.6 mm and 0.7 ± 0.6 mm, mean apical and coronal depth deviation of 1.4 ± 0.3 mm and 1.3 ± 0.3 mm, and mean angular deviation of 4.2° ± 2.0° and 3.0° ± 1.5° for tooth/bone supported and bone-supported guides, respectively. No statistical differences were found in depth or angular deviations between groups (P > .05); however, statistically significant differences between groups were found in mean horizontal coronal deviation (P = .016) and mean horizontal apical deviation (P = .047). The StentCad Beyond system was found to be a reliable guide for placing implants ex vivo.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Murat</LastName><ForeName>Sema</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. semamurat47@yahoo.com.tr</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kamburoğlu</LastName><ForeName>Kivanç</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Özen</LastName><ForeName>Tuncer</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D023361">Validation Studies</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2011</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>18</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7801086</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0160-6972</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002102" MajorTopicYN="N">Cadaver</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D054893" MajorTopicYN="Y">Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007091" MajorTopicYN="Y">Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D023861" MajorTopicYN="N">Photography, Dental</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012986" MajorTopicYN="N">Software Validation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D025321" MajorTopicYN="Y">Surgery, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21767205</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00062</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Turquie</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Kamburo Lu, Kivanc" sort="Kamburo Lu, Kivanc" uniqKey="Kamburo Lu K" first="Kivanç" last="Kamburo Lu">Kivanç Kamburo Lu</name><name sortKey="Ozen, Tuncer" sort="Ozen, Tuncer" uniqKey="Ozen T" first="Tuncer" last="Özen">Tuncer Özen</name></noCountry><country name="Turquie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Murat, Sema" sort="Murat, Sema" uniqKey="Murat S" first="Sema" last="Murat">Sema Murat</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F52 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000F52 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21767205
|texte= Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21767205" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |